<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IRONMAN</title>
	<link>http://thefoologs.com/ironman/</link>
	<description>A Blog about life, technology, sport and just about everything else.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: patrick</title>
		<link>http://thefoologs.com/ironman/#comment-4840</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 05:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thefoologs.com/ironman/#comment-4840</guid>
					<description>Iron Man was practically flawless as a super hero flick; it drops pretty obvious hints that would indicate a sequel as well... i'm thinking the next one should be equally great</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iron Man was practically flawless as a super hero flick; it drops pretty obvious hints that would indicate a sequel as well&#8230; i&#8217;m thinking the next one should be equally great
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: yoshi</title>
		<link>http://thefoologs.com/ironman/#comment-4812</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 04:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thefoologs.com/ironman/#comment-4812</guid>
					<description>yeah, you're totally right. Tom is definitely not one for the comedic roles. I think Robert Downey is just about perfect for this.

And I believe either 4th quarter 2008 or next year for wolvie. can't wait. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, you&#8217;re totally right. Tom is definitely not one for the comedic roles. I think Robert Downey is just about perfect for this.</p>
<p>And I believe either 4th quarter 2008 or next year for wolvie. can&#8217;t wait. :D
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Foo</title>
		<link>http://thefoologs.com/ironman/#comment-4811</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 04:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thefoologs.com/ironman/#comment-4811</guid>
					<description>Yeah Wolverine would be worth watching. I think it'll be next year till it gets released as i believe it is still in production.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Wolverine would be worth watching. I think it&#8217;ll be next year till it gets released as i believe it is still in production.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Foo</title>
		<link>http://thefoologs.com/ironman/#comment-4810</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 04:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thefoologs.com/ironman/#comment-4810</guid>
					<description>Tom's role is more to serious type action films... humor is not his strong point. He is not good enough an actor to pull off a movie like this where the lead actor needs a mixture or humor and seriousness in him. And yes, no matter how eccentric he his, he does make some really powerpack films e.g. Mission Impossible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom&#8217;s role is more to serious type action films&#8230; humor is not his strong point. He is not good enough an actor to pull off a movie like this where the lead actor needs a mixture or humor and seriousness in him. And yes, no matter how eccentric he his, he does make some really powerpack films e.g. Mission Impossible.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: yoshi</title>
		<link>http://thefoologs.com/ironman/#comment-4809</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 02:38:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thefoologs.com/ironman/#comment-4809</guid>
					<description>Oh that's totally I agree! Tom does do a little bit of overacting doesn't he. He does have some great movies though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh that&#8217;s totally I agree! Tom does do a little bit of overacting doesn&#8217;t he. He does have some great movies though!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Foo</title>
		<link>http://thefoologs.com/ironman/#comment-4808</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 01:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thefoologs.com/ironman/#comment-4808</guid>
					<description>i think nicholas cage would have been too laid back and tom cruise's overacting would have made it too fake. he would have wanted too much money anyway which would have been at the expense of the movie special effects and other stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think nicholas cage would have been too laid back and tom cruise&#8217;s overacting would have made it too fake. he would have wanted too much money anyway which would have been at the expense of the movie special effects and other stuff.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: yoshi</title>
		<link>http://thefoologs.com/ironman/#comment-4807</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 23:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thefoologs.com/ironman/#comment-4807</guid>
					<description>I totally have to admit I was excited to see this finally coming out. It's been a long time coming.

I wasn't sure at first if Robert Downey jr was a good choice until I saw the previews. Yeah, I think he'll do just fine. I'm not sure if Tom Cruise or Nicholas Cage would have been any better. I think I like Nicholas Cage as ghost rider better. :D

But yeah, I'm so ready for this movie. I'm totally excited for Wolverine too. I love the wolverine. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally have to admit I was excited to see this finally coming out. It&#8217;s been a long time coming.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t sure at first if Robert Downey jr was a good choice until I saw the previews. Yeah, I think he&#8217;ll do just fine. I&#8217;m not sure if Tom Cruise or Nicholas Cage would have been any better. I think I like Nicholas Cage as ghost rider better. :D</p>
<p>But yeah, I&#8217;m so ready for this movie. I&#8217;m totally excited for Wolverine too. I love the wolverine. :D
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
